I would this as joke not portraying moderation. I would Trolik-we have on the your place "thank you" said, not khayal - he modicum something offers and Takes the Lead. And now before as tilting rotten apples and any rotten Wen in me "read thought about":
Sit I read this subject and regard its not with perspective the fishing trainer or the fishing trainer-athlete, and with perspective manager-management has, which Hypnotizes promotion and promotion projects with neslabymi budgets. And have been arguing analyze business project let even and such unprofitable, as fidernaya section FRSU. Only need not tell, that have us all on interests and everywhere altruism - everywhere there is economic interests (looks and superstructure - recall category: Political economy, that instruct in universities).
I’d say immediately, that with perspective businessman in our country project "Sports feeder" not seems interested. What profits (reffering the cost of - again Hi political economy) with him can be obtain? And after all this in primarily interested in those from whom there is financial means to ensure effluents project. Now about factors, affecting project. Here is that can be burn in many: Low level of life a common masses target audience, low popularity this species fishing industrialized fishing (far us until dubinschikov), a weak his popularization (with perspective correct as industrialized fishing), and most importantly - mentality (as this fish issue. That burn in asset? Modicum kill - not know. Except own understanding of, that this progressive ulovistyy kind of fishing industrialized fishing and personal get high from use subtleties and very responsive cordages - more nothing. Adjust if that . And as under THAT attract "sponsors, Lange, investors" - whom need project with "long one" the maturity return investment? Yes and will whether he at all. This the first.
The second. Every business project can be on their airline only in three social relations system - a loss, unprofitable, profitable. Fourth NOT DANO. And who, what derp will invest their money in invariably a loss project?! For particular and-argued case conversation on topic need the usual business plan - volume of investment, timeline return these the most investment. Even if project unprofitable, where borrow "a profitable part of" on ensuring his effluents (holding competition and other things)? In any case requires financial ensuring on period start-on the material. Essentially all who now is participating in sporting event fidernom movement and are his investors. ???? without curiously there quotes. And if "the ice the channels, we, Messrs., juries Furthermore" own forces, then only then business may be interested in these project and will appear serious sponsors have sporting fidera, as this is happening in evropakh and Russia.
Third. That concerns democracy in business projects - its NO and not can be in principle. There is "storming assault on" of collective, there is "the additional burden in integrated time" individual performers, there is work team, but there is someone one Undersecretary for project and Gvozdev entire responsibility, but and takes definitive decisions. One of the beliefs of project-management (governance projects): The manager project has absolute power in decision making on vverennomu him project and access to all resources parliaments on waging project. But he also bears absolute personal RESPONSABILITY for outcome project. Not likes or not causes confidence one the manager - take another. Or if this impossible - not participate in project. And the latest option - wear an its project.
Last edited by duffy333 (Dec 9 2010 23:10:44)